|
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Herbert Aptheker and University of Massachusetts Press, respectively editor and publisher of Against Racism, a collection of unpublished speeches and papers by Du Bois, in which the following speech appears on pages 173-184. |
Historically Americans have sought three ways out of this impasse:
religious conversion: climatic extinction and biologic inferiority. The
conscience of England and New England based excuse for slavery on heathenism,
from which the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel proposed wholesale
conversion. Invested capital in the colonies resisted this effort first by
obstructing the instruction of slaves and finally by declaring openly with
Virginia in 1667: "Baptism doth not alter the condition of the person as to
his bondage or freedom, in order that diverse masters freed from this doubt may
more carefully endeavor the propagation of Christianity."
There
is no doubt of the large public opinion which historically turned to one
solution of this problem and that was the question of how to be rid of these
people by natural death; how by physical removal or social pressure so to reduce
the number of proportion of persons of Negro descent that the residue could be
absorbed without noticeable difficulty. It is interesting to reflect how
sincerely we have hoped in the past for some such solution. When for instance,
the fathers of the American Revolution suppressed the slave trade they believed
that they were not only curbing an unholy traffic, but also, by cutting off the
artificial increase of the Negro population, they were going to leave the
Negroes already in America to a fate of inevitable extinction. Relying on the
evidence of the slave trade in the West Indies and in some parts of the United
States, they believed that from climatic reasons and biologic differences, the
Negro could not survive, unassisted by foreign immigration. Jamaica, for
instance, had in 1690, 40,000 Negroes. Between 1620 and 1820, 800,000 more were
imported. Yet in 1820 there were only 340,000 Negroes on the island. The
supporters of the colonization movement were of many minds; some wished simply
to transport free Negroes. But numbers hoped to assist nature by starting Negro
emigration, which would gradually so grow in volume as to reduce the Negro
population and leave the residue to self-extinction, through the very
hopelessness of their situation.
After the American Civil War this hope was reborn. Governor Sharkey of
Mississippi sat before a congressional committee in 1866 and assured them with
tears in his eyes that the emancipated Negroes were bound to die out. "My
expectation concerning them is that they are destined to extinction, beyond all
doubt. We must judge of the future by the past. I could tell you a great many
circumstances to that effect; I am sorry I did not come prepared with means to
state the percentage of deaths among them. It is alarming, appalling. I think
they will gradually die out. Some of them will become thrifty' and prosperous;
but as a general thing, I think they are destined to extinction. I may be
mistaken; I hope I am; but that is my impression." The census of 1870
seemed to confirm this; showing an increase of less than 10 per cent for Negroes
in the decade; but when in 1880 there came a census more accurately and more
scientifically taken, the whole nation was aghast at an apparent Negro increase
of 35 per cent. The nation, we might say, was bitterly disappointed because the
Negro race in America was surviving; and was only partially appeased when these
official figures were officially "revised" to increases of 21 per cent
and 22 per cent respectively.
In South America the same problem was faced in a
different way: there was no question of letting the chief labor force die out;
let it live and work; but let it become a real part of the state only as it was
physically absorbed into the white race. Brazil, with eighteen million Negroes
and mulattoes out of fifty million inhabitants in 1940, was never particularly
worried as to whether the Negro died out or not, so long as he remained a fairly
submissive laborer and was gradually absorbed into the nation leaving white
culture dominant.
Realizing at last more or less clearly and after the
lapse of long years, that the Negro physically is a fixture in America, without
the slightest hope that he is going to decrease in numbers, we are faced by the
question as to how far force, either the social force of caste or actual
physical force in other guise, can be used to settle this problem of black folk
in America. Of course the greatest hindrance here is the ethical problem. After
all, America represents the part of the world where the Christian religion has
shown in some respects its highest development and most efficient organization.
It was possible so to twist the tenets of that religion as at first to excuse
the slave trade and afterward to condone slavery; but it was more difficult for
Christians to face the problem of caste restriction and social suppression.
Deliberate and planned suppression of a group of human
beings could only be defended if it were based on religious dogma or on accepted
scientific proof of an inborn and unchangeable inferiority' that no wish nor act
could change and which put the sacred duty of self defense on white
civilization. The
attempt of the Christian church, Catholic and Protestant, to build a foundation
of religious dogma and biblical sanction beneath Negro slavery is one of the
most curious and disreputable incidents of organized religion. As Bishop Hopkins
of Vermont solemnly voiced it: "The Almighty, foreseeing this total
degradation of the race, ordained them to servitude or slavery under the
descendants of Shem and Japheth, doubtless because he judged it to be their
fittest condition. And all history proves how accurately the prediction has been
accomplished, even to the present day."
Gradually appeal was made to science in place of
theology. It is astonishing with what bitter, almost missionary zeal, the
attempt to prove the biological inferiority of the Negro was carried on for over
a hundred years and still persists in wide circles. It began with the Cotton
Kingdom and the attempt to defend its income by proving Negroes were natural and
eternal slaves. Religion, and philanthropy were forced into subserviency to this
dogma. And even today when science has rebelled and regained its independence
and self-respect, the belief in Negro inferiority widely persists.
Click Here to join the discussion